You finally received your CT or MRI results, and maybe your report says everything looks “normal.” That’s reassuring, but it might not be the full story. Even with advanced technology and skilled radiologists, body imaging exams are among the most complex and frequently misinterpreted studies in radiology.
Small findings can be easy to overlook, while others are mistaken for something they’re not. That’s why many patients today are choosing to get a radiology second opinion, not to question their doctor, but to make sure nothing important was missed.
What Is “Body Imaging”?
Body imaging refers to radiology exams that focus on the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, areas that include critical organs like the liver, kidneys, pancreas, bowel, bladder, uterus, and lungs. These exams are performed using CT scans, MRIs, and ultrasounds to help detect everything from inflammation and infection to tumors and internal bleeding.
As these organs are densely packed and can show subtle, overlapping changes, even experienced general radiologists may interpret findings differently than a subspecialized body imaging radiologist who reads these exams every day.
The Most Commonly Missed or Misinterpreted Findings
Studies reviewing over a million imaging exams show that CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis account for nearly 40% of major radiology interpretation errors.¹
Some of the most frequent misdiagnoses include:
- Small liver or kidney masses mistaken for benign findings
- Early appendicitis, diverticulitis, or bowel ischemia not recognized in early stages
- Ovarian torsion or complex cysts missed or misclassified
- Adrenal or lung nodules dismissed without proper follow-up
- Subtle lymph node enlargement not identified as abnormal
These aren’t just academic errors, they can delay diagnosis, change treatment decisions, and in some cases lead to unnecessary surgeries.
Why Misdiagnoses Happen
Even the best radiologists face challenges when interpreting body imaging exams.
Common factors include:
- Perceptual errors: Small or faint findings that are easy to miss
- Cognitive errors: Findings seen but misinterpreted
- Limited clinical information: Incomplete history or missing prior studies
- Fatigue and time pressure: Many radiologists read dozens of complex studies daily
-
Lack of subspecialty focus: Generalists may not have advanced training in specific organ systems
That’s why a second opinion from a subspecialized focused body imaging specialist can make all the difference.
How a Second Opinion Through MDView Can Help
At MDView, every case is matched with a board-certified radiologist who specializes in the exact type of imaging you had, whether it’s an abdominal CT, pelvis MRI, or chest CT scan.
Your second opinion includes:
- A thorough re-review of your imaging and report
- A clear, written summary in plain language
- Delivery within 72 hours, so you don’t wait weeks for clarity
Patients often come to MDView because their original report left them uncertain, or because their symptoms didn’t match what the report described. In many cases, our specialists have found findings that changed a patient’s diagnosis or treatment plan, leading to faster care and peace of mind.
Protect Your Health With an Expert Second Look
Getting a second opinion doesn’t mean you doubt your doctor. It means you’re taking an active role in your health, making sure every possible explanation has been considered.
If you’ve had a CT or MRI of your abdomen, pelvis, or chest and still feel unsure about the results, or you just want confidence that nothing was missed, an MDView second opinion can provide the answers you need.
Upload your scan securely at MDView.com and get an expert review from a subspecialized body imaging radiologist, often in less than 72 hours. Get started today at https://app.mdview.com and upload your exam. If you don't have your exam available to upload, MDView can get it on your behalf from the hospital or imaging center at no cost to you!
Because when it comes to your health, peace of mind shouldn’t have to wait.
¹ Radiology. 2021; 300(3):E254–E263. Quality assurance study of 1.6 million exams.